shibboleth-dev - RE: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott E." <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 20:55:45 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
> What's basically happening is that the OpenSAML Configuration can't
> lookup the builder for that element. I don't like NPE's showing up in
> code, but it's an unfortunate fact that throughout the IdP, we don't
> check for null when we lookup builders, marshallers and unmarshallers.
> We probably should, but it would entail updating probably thousands of
> calls.
Is there a default builder of the sort I have? That would at least make it
perhaps a class-cast exception. Not sure that's any better, but...
-- Scott
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Halm Reusser, 01/05/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Halm Reusser, 01/07/2011
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Idp-ext-delegation & 2.2 idp, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.