Shibboleth Developers

[Chad La Joie <>]

None.  The original question was about vt-ldap 3.X.  As we've discussed 
before, this change would lead to changes in the LDAP attribute resolver 
configuration and would thus lead to incompatible config files after 
upgrades, which isn't acceptable within a major release series.

I have no problem including a new 2.X vt-ldap release that does not 
"break" any of the existing configs.

On 2/3/10 10:29 AM, Daniel Fisher wrote:
> Chad, what are your concerns with applying this patch for a 2.1.x release?
> It's not much different from what is provided in SC-73, except we
> continue to leverage commons-pool rather than the new vt-ldap pool.


--
Chad La Joie
www.itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered