shibboleth-dev - RE: [Shib-Dev] idp's ispassive response
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] idp's ispassive response
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:51:22 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> What should the response be from the IdP when an request with isPassive
> results in no user?
I don't think I understand what you mean by "no user". The "standard"
situation where it doesn't work is that there's no valid session with a
user, so you would return NoPassive. I think you mean some other condition,
but AFAIK you pretty much stick with NoPassive because that's supposed to be
the "all clear" signal to the SP.
> Status:NoPassive doesn't seem right either, as the request was handled.
NoPassive means the request wasn't handled...if it was handled, that would
be success.
-- Scott
- idp's ispassive response, Jim Fox, 12/17/2008
- RE: [Shib-Dev] idp's ispassive response, Scott Cantor, 12/17/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] idp's ispassive response, Jim Fox, 12/17/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] idp's ispassive response, Chad La Joie, 12/17/2008
- RE: [Shib-Dev] idp's ispassive response, Jim Fox, 12/19/2008
- RE: [Shib-Dev] idp's ispassive response, Scott Cantor, 12/17/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] idp's ispassive response, Chad La Joie, 12/17/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] idp's ispassive response, Jim Fox, 12/17/2008
- RE: [Shib-Dev] idp's ispassive response, Scott Cantor, 12/17/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.