shibboleth-dev - RE: Dynamic Federation
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Josh Howlett" <>
- To: <>, <>
- Cc: "Josh Howlett" <>
- Subject: RE: Dynamic Federation
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 14:11:46 -0000
> > I appreciate the desirability of eliminating the dependency on PKI
> > (user confusion, CA fickleness, etc), but PKIX is one trust
> system of
> > many. Is this an operational concern (simplest to keep entity
> > configuration and trust in one place?) or something else?
>
> I think that experience has shown that operationally, yes, it
> is much easier if all of the material is unified. But even
> more than that, it's a design consideration.
In what way? (I apologise if this is a daft question, I am just trying
to understand!)
josh.
JANET(UK) is a trading name of The JNT Association, a company limited
by guarantee which is registered in England under No. 2881024
and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue,
Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG
- Dynamic Federation, Tom Scavo, 12/01/2007
- RE: Dynamic Federation, Scott Cantor, 12/01/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Dynamic Federation, Josh Howlett, 12/01/2007
- RE: Dynamic Federation, Scott Cantor, 12/01/2007
- Message not available
- RE: Dynamic Federation, Josh Howlett, 12/01/2007
- RE: Dynamic Federation, Scott Cantor, 12/01/2007
- Message not available
- RE: Dynamic Federation, Josh Howlett, 12/03/2007
- RE: Dynamic Federation, Scott Cantor, 12/03/2007
- Message not available
- RE: Dynamic Federation, Josh Howlett, 12/04/2007
- RE: Dynamic Federation, Scott Cantor, 12/04/2007
- Message not available
- Re: Dynamic Federation, Tom Scavo, 12/04/2007
- RE: Dynamic Federation, Josh Howlett, 12/03/2007
- RE: Dynamic Federation, Josh Howlett, 12/01/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.