Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: The Grid Use Case

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: The Grid Use Case


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Tom Scavo" <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: The Grid Use Case
  • Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:28:51 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=t/YUfnezCxREbLCPXdgr/3U9uyWXL9T6JDE53NqmJ9wPh1C+TMbpkJex4OHsZdUVCf8DONziNPzagrqq+pRIndQrm2nVHeGpkjEmF8sCFl7ZutpxeeSj+vmHjLmI3szWdg/OTan2IvZ+jcgll3YgPCcUE0aGpR0CwGmiGpV4N50=
On 10/31/07, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
> Yes, right now. One, or both, of those may be in place before 2.0 is
> released. Certainly the persistent nameID represents something that a
> individual that had a bit of Spring knowledge, or at least the ability
> to read the Spring docs, could do and contribute back with relative ease.

I don't think this will solve the problem. Unless the core Shib
developers implement, document, and support ePTID (or a
non-reassignable version of persistent NameID), the problem will
remain.

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page