shibboleth-dev - Re: The Grid Use Case

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: The Grid Use Case

From: "Tom Scavo" <>
To:
Subject: Re: The Grid Use Case
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 12:49:26 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ouluvbJXPQzXsR1xxMVzn3IJ2bBHFKyrYGtezjBPeGas+B7hcNLivY4aRxU6y6w25+cqIDYykWbx31gZEry5yhhk/Xa8n31SdQEiX4Ic+9S2/ICAeTV3ckGE9L26IP9i6D6INtuVLSbj99qfibvJOs8b+tk7mMskQAagkcTlSXQ=

On 10/31/07, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
>
> All encryption is done on a per-relying party basis, or per-relying
> party group (i.e. EntitiesDescriptor).

Is the same true of digital signature? Can assertions be signed or
not as the case may be?

Thanks,
Tom

The Grid Use Case, Tom Scavo, 10/31/2007
- Re: The Grid Use Case, Chad La Joie, 10/31/2007
  - Re: The Grid Use Case, Tom Scavo, 10/31/2007
    - Re: The Grid Use Case, Chad La Joie, 10/31/2007
      - Re: The Grid Use Case, Tom Scavo, 10/31/2007
        
        Re: The Grid Use Case, Chad La Joie, 10/31/2007
        
        Re: The Grid Use Case, Tom Scavo, 10/31/2007
        
        Re: The Grid Use Case, Chad La Joie, 10/31/2007
        Re: The Grid Use Case, Tom Scavo, 10/31/2007
        Re: The Grid Use Case, Chad La Joie, 10/31/2007
        Re: The Grid Use Case, Tom Scavo, 10/31/2007
        RE: The Grid Use Case, Scott Cantor, 10/31/2007
        
        Message not available
        Re: The Grid Use Case, Tom Scavo, 10/31/2007
        RE: The Grid Use Case, Scott Cantor, 10/31/2007
- RE: The Grid Use Case, Scott Cantor, 10/31/2007
- Message not available
  - Re: The Grid Use Case, Tom Scavo, 10/31/2007
    - RE: The Grid Use Case, Scott Cantor, 10/31/2007

List archive

Re: The Grid Use Case