Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: wrt user entry of a pointer to their IDP ..or.. "invisible SSO"

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: wrt user entry of a pointer to their IDP ..or.. "invisible SSO"


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Tom Scavo" <>
  • To:
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: wrt user entry of a pointer to their IDP ..or.. "invisible SSO"
  • Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:31:01 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CfavLNVK7ilGGWXIgDHjO897XydmcHQV909Gbe8ZVsD8gMk9pX4ViKJ1p/z+E1fGdassJNpZ6qFU89d8EOGUkh5D45+2uNhPbFkOaJ/SqMjJ4wgXUpftN8yfpuEOrCkokj+bQ5P77lT7DvflKM+N7GaBkyj3ITCBDG3JY7BVzdc=
Hi Jeff,

On 9/11/07, Jeff Hodges
<>
wrote:
>
> As IDP discovery continues to be a key aspect of single signon protocol
> design,
> and has figured non-trivially in our work on SAMLv2, Liberty, etc, not to
> mention being a defining feature of OpenID, I'm quite interested in hearing
> the
> perspectives of the deployers/implementors in this community.

What about the SAML V2.0 Identity Provider Discovery Profile? (The
IdPDP came from Liberty, did it not?) One idea is to implement a
Common Domain as an IdP Proxy (another Liberty concept, right?). Has
anybody tried this, do you know?

Thanks,
Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page