Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-10

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-10


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Scott Cantor <>
  • Cc: Shibboleth Development <>
  • Subject: Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-10
  • Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 11:41:33 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NBJ+JrTJNdJia1YcplJeubmNW/6UiItPKewnAHi2oiSIylSmfqKFPtBeTiH6XzHWVk47JHBDM7Kg86DdtI5YPoo145QcZ3k3r0jVUfkpUAYbdZ3x57p2jHbemQPPaKzy0FvkVMnino0oAA3jPtSklHdK23pXruLd1Wbpcnf0tOo=
On 9/10/05, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
>
> I think when it's just developers testing their code at conferences, you
> can get the wire profile by itself to work with enough knob twisting,
> which is basically what my experience was. But when there was a
> consistent metadata profile between the peers, as I had with with
> Trustgenix and HP, it was much easier.

HP is a licensee of the Trustgenix toolkit, is it not?

What about CA? Recent announcements indicate SiteMinder support for
SAML 2.0, but does this include metadata support, do you know?

Do you think metadata support in OpenSAML will improve the situation?

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page