shibboleth-dev - RE: entityID (or providerId)
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: "'Tom Scavo'" <>, "'Shibboleth Development'" <>
- Subject: RE: entityID (or providerId)
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:15:11 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> Also, I think we should start using the term "entityID" rather than
> "providerId" in our documentation and writing. As Howard has pointed
> out, the latter is hopelessly overloaded.
Overloaded with what? The biggest annoyance was that Liberty invented both
terms here but put entityID in the metadata, which I probably should have
changed, but either way, I don't know what else is a providerId. I'd never
even heard the term before.
-- Scott
- entityID (or providerId), Tom Scavo, 06/23/2005
- Re: entityID (or providerId), Nate Klingenstein, 06/23/2005
- Re: entityID (or providerId), Tom Scavo, 06/23/2005
- RE: entityID (or providerId), Scott Cantor, 06/23/2005
- Re: entityID (or providerId), Tom Scavo, 06/23/2005
- RE: entityID (or providerId), Scott Cantor, 06/23/2005
- Re: entityID (or providerId), Tom Scavo, 06/23/2005
- RE: entityID (or providerId), Scott Cantor, 06/23/2005
- Re: entityID (or providerId), Tom Scavo, 06/23/2005
- Re: entityID (or providerId), Nate Klingenstein, 06/23/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.