Shibboleth Developers

[Tom Scavo <>]

Alistair, thanks for the clarification.  It is confusing, isn't it? 
That's why I'm trying to write this all down, once and for all. 
Here's what I have so far:

Implementations of SAML 1.1 core:
- OpenSAML 1.0.1 (Java/C++) http://www.opensaml.org/
- SourceID SAML 1.1 Java Toolkit 2.0
http://www.sourceid.org/projects/saml-1.1-toolkit.html
- SAMUEL (Java) http://sourceforge.net/projects/guanxi/ 
- Proprietary vendor implementations

Implementations of SAML 1.1 profiles:
- Shibboleth 1.3 http://shibboleth.internet2.edu/
- Proprietary vendor implementations

Implementations of Shibboleth (the spec):
- Shibboleth (of course!) http://shibboleth.internet2.edu/
- Guanxi http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=project_guanxi
- AthensIM (IdP only) http://www.athensams.net/shibboleth/AthensIM/

Implementations of Liberty ID-FF:
- SourceID ID-FF 1.2 Java Toolkit 2.0
http://www.sourceid.org/projects/id-ff-1.2-java-toolkit.html
- Lasso http://lasso.entrouvert.org/
- Proprietary vendor implementations

Look good?  Am I still missing something?

Tom

On 4/27/05, Alistair Young 
<>
 wrote:
> > I suppose you could argue that Guanxi and AthensIM are
> > implementations of SAML by extension
>
> not quite. A SAML toolkit would be an implementation of SAML, i.e.
> openSAML and SAMUEL. Guanxi and AthensIM are implementations of the
> Shibboleth profile that use a SAML implementation, openSAML in AthensIM's
> case, SAMUEL in Guanxi's