shibboleth-dev - RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Cc: <>
- Subject: RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:06:49 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> The domain suffix IPDP just seems to fit the bill for users and agents.
As a matter of reality, dealing with all the mis-entered values and so forth
results in essentially exactly the same user experience. IOW, I don't think
it buys you much, and I don't think that it's a good idea in general to
federate authentication within the UI of any one application. This is an
area of significant disagreement, I realize, but I think it's a step down
the wrong road.
Better to unify "local" access under the common federated structure so that
it looks the same as any other users.
You don't have to use a WAYF to do this, it can be made part of the UI of
the application.
> Needless to say, the password is only entered at the IdP side. Or, if
> trust is enough, in a federation, the password can be entered
> at the SP and sent back to the IdP in AuthnRequest.
That's not allowed, or desired.
-- Scott
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, (continued)
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/01/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/01/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/01/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/01/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Tom Scavo, 11/02/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/02/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Tom Scavo, 11/17/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/17/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Tom Scavo, 11/17/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/17/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/17/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/17/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/17/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/17/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/18/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Tom Scavo, 11/18/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/22/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Tom Scavo, 11/22/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/22/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Tom Scavo, 11/22/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/18/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/22/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/17/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/17/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Tom Scavo, 11/17/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/17/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.