Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Scott Cantor" <>
  • To: <>
  • Cc: <>
  • Subject: RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02
  • Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:06:49 -0500
  • Organization: The Ohio State University

> The domain suffix IPDP just seems to fit the bill for users and agents.

As a matter of reality, dealing with all the mis-entered values and so forth
results in essentially exactly the same user experience. IOW, I don't think
it buys you much, and I don't think that it's a good idea in general to
federate authentication within the UI of any one application. This is an
area of significant disagreement, I realize, but I think it's a step down
the wrong road.

Better to unify "local" access under the common federated structure so that
it looks the same as any other users.

You don't have to use a WAYF to do this, it can be made part of the UI of
the application.

> Needless to say, the password is only entered at the IdP side. Or, if
> trust is enough, in a federation, the password can be entered
> at the SP and sent back to the IdP in AuthnRequest.

That's not allowed, or desired.

-- Scott




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page