shibboleth-dev - Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Alistair Young <>
- To: "Scott Cantor" <>
- Cc: <>
- Subject: Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:55:03 +0000
maybe I'm reading it wrong, or I've got the wrong version of the spec:
3.3 NameIdentifier Profile
SAML identifies principals in assertions using the <saml:NameIdentifier> element, which contains a
pair of descriptive XML attributes, Format and NameQualifier.
Shibboleth permits any legal SAML name identifier to be used, and also defines a special kind of identifier
with the Format value of urn:mace:shibboleth:1.0:nameIdentifier. Identifiers of this format
MUST adhere to the following criteria:
<x-tad-smaller>• </x-tad-smaller>The identifier has transient semantics and SHOULD be treated as an opaque and temporary
value by the relying party.
Alistair
On 1 Nov 2004, at 14:36, Scott Cantor wrote:
SAML1 has a nameID but shibb defines it's own namespace for this which
says it should be opaque and transient.
It says no such thing. It defines a means of doing this when you need to
because assuming privacy is a concern is a better default than not assuming
it.
I haven't spotted this use case in SAML2 (maybe I'm missing something)
Yep.
Check section 8.3.7 of core. That is effectively the definition of eptid
that I want to move to.
-- Scott
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/01/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/01/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/01/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/01/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/01/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/01/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/01/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/01/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/01/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Tom Scavo, 11/02/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/02/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Tom Scavo, 11/17/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/17/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Tom Scavo, 11/17/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/17/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/17/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Scott Cantor, 11/17/2004
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/17/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Tom Scavo, 11/17/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, Alistair Young, 11/17/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-02, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.