shibboleth-dev - Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03

From: SCOTT CANTOR <>
To: Tom Scavo <>
Cc: Shibboleth Development <>
Subject: Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:20:30 -0500
Priority: normal

> Yes, I understand now. Shouldn't this sentence be followed by another
> sentence describing how the browser/artifact profile handles errors?
> That will prevent any misunderstandings, I think.

I guess...more like "it doesn't handle errors"? SAML was one-way, so there
was no use case for how to respond with an error. It's not even clear that
the POST profile specifically allows for it.

-- Scott

RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03, (continued)
- RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03, Scott Cantor, 11/11/2004
  - Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03, Tom Scavo, 11/11/2004
    - RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03, Scott Cantor, 11/11/2004
      - Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03, Walter Hoehn, 11/11/2004
      - Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03, Tom Scavo, 11/11/2004
        
        RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03, Scott Cantor, 11/11/2004
        
        Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03, Tom Scavo, 11/11/2004
        
        RE: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03, Scott Cantor, 11/11/2004
  - Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03, Tom Scavo, 11/16/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/11/2004
- Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03, SCOTT CANTOR, 11/16/2004

List archive

Re: comments: draft-mace-shibboleth-arch-protocols-03