Shibboleth Developers

[Walter Hoehn <>]

I guess I could extend the AttributeDesignatorType, but I don't see  
what that buys me at all.

-Walter


On Nov 15, 2004, at 1:33 PM, Tom Scavo wrote:

> It *could* be (both <saml:Attribute> and <md:RequestedAttribute>, for
> instance, are based on <saml:AttributeType>) but my question is:
> *should* it be?  Are we talking about the same type of attributes in
> ARPs?
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 13:25:45 -0600, Walter Hoehn <>  
> wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > I don't see how it could be.  Maybe I don't understand what you are
> > proposing...
> >
> > -Walter
> >
> > On Nov 14, 2004, at 11:37 AM, Tom Scavo wrote:
> >
> > > Shouldn't <arp:AttributeType> be based on <saml:AttributeType>?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Tom
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:44:51 -0500, Tom Scavo <>  
> > > wrote:
> > > > Found it!
> > > >
> > > > http://anoncvs.internet2.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/shibboleth/java/ 
> > > > src/
> > > > schemas/shibboleth-arp-1.0.xsd
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:40:09 -0500, Tom Scavo 
> > > > <>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Does a precise XML schema for ARPs exist?  There are some examples  
> > > > > of
> > > > > ARP syntax in the IdP deployment guide but I can't find a schema.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Tom

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature