shibboleth-dev - RE: ARP schema

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

RE: ARP schema

From: "Scott Cantor" <>
To: "'Tom Scavo'" <>, "'Walter Hoehn'" <>
Cc: "'Shibboleth Development'" <>
Subject: RE: ARP schema
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:39:17 -0500
Organization: The Ohio State University

> It *could* be (both <saml:Attribute> and <md:RequestedAttribute>, for
> instance, are based on <saml:AttributeType>) but my question is:
> *should* it be? Are we talking about the same type of attributes in
> ARPs?

Yes, but why does it matter? First of all, this work predates all of SAMLv2
and has been done for years, and secondly, what does it buy us anyway?

Shared data structures through XML typing are only minimally useful when
you're talking about something this trivial.

-- Scott

ARP schema, Tom Scavo, 11/05/2004
- Re: ARP schema, Tom Scavo, 11/05/2004
  - Re: ARP schema, Walter Hoehn, 11/05/2004
    - Re: ARP schema, Tom Scavo, 11/05/2004
      - Re: ARP schema, Walter Hoehn, 11/05/2004
  - Re: ARP schema, Tom Scavo, 11/14/2004
    - Re: ARP schema, Walter Hoehn, 11/15/2004
      - Re: ARP schema, Tom Scavo, 11/15/2004
        
        RE: ARP schema, Scott Cantor, 11/15/2004
        
        Re: ARP schema, Walter Hoehn, 11/15/2004

List archive

RE: ARP schema