Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - RE: Apache2: one module or two?

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

RE: Apache2: one module or two?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Scott Cantor <>
  • To: 'RL 'Bob' Morgan' <>, 'Derek Atkins' <>
  • Cc: 'Shibboleth Design Team' <>
  • Subject: RE: Apache2: one module or two?
  • Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:24:29 -0400
  • Importance: Normal
  • Organization: The Ohio State University

> This sounds fine (then we could call it mod_shib and not have
> to explain what shire and rm mean), but are you implying this
> would just be the Apache2 version? I guess I haven't kept
> track of whether we intend to distribute distinct Apache1 and
> Apache2 versions (presumably would have to with binaries) or
> all-in-one. Seems like having the module layout be different
> between the two would be a pain support-wise.

I don't know if it's realistic to have one source base or not. Might be.
Probably we should merge the modules for 1.x, though.

> I seem to recall Mark Wilcox hinting a while ago that there
> is work going on in Apache-land to restructure the way authn
> and authz work in httpd. I wonder whether there's any info
> about that that might guide our design now. I'm always
> concerned about things being in a lump when the deployer
> would rather have them separable. But the above sounds OK to me.

Given that they're not all that speedy about docs for released stuff, I
doubt there's much there yet...

-- Scott

------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at

http://archives.internet2.edu/

------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page