shibboleth-dev - Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "RL 'Bob' Morgan" <>
- To: Derek Atkins <>
- Cc: Shibboleth Design Team <>
- Subject: Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario
- Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 01:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
On 5 Jun 2003, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > can you tell if that RSA cert is "the same one" found in standard
> > distributions (eg openssl bundle)?
>
> I do not know. it's the one labeled:
>
> <!-- RSA Secure Server CA -->
>
> in the trust.xml file. It parses fine into an x509 object but
> OpenSSL fails to add it to the keystore. I don't know why --
> I don't have a debugging-build of openssl lying around.
I bet it's because it's exactly the same cert as the one earlier in the
file called "Verisign/RSA Secure Server CA", so it probably barfs when
trying to add two roots with the same issuer/subject/etc.
Turns out my other problem was that while trying to test various CA
approaches I had left, in the perq target trust.xml file, the
shib.cac.washington.edu-specific key in its own KeyAuthority section, but
of course having changed the actual cert/key being used by the shib HS,
this caused validation to fail using that key. I don't know if we'd
expect the shar to keep trying to validate the assertion after the
specific key it had for that HS failed; I suppose so. So, anyway, I
removed that and got an "untrusted HS" error or something like that.
Based on Derek's discovery I figured I could just remove the duplicate RSA
cert from the trust.xml file on perq and it would start to work ... and
indeed it did. So hey. I tried with a minimal trust.xml that only
includes the UW CA certifying the incommon:pilot, and that works too.
So, that wasn't so hard ... sigh.
- RL "Bob"
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Derek Atkins, 06/05/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/05/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Derek Atkins, 06/05/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Derek Atkins, 06/05/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Derek Atkins, 06/05/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Derek Atkins, 06/05/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Steven_Carmody, 06/05/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Derek Atkins, 06/05/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Steven_Carmody, 06/05/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Derek Atkins, 06/05/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Steven_Carmody, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Derek Atkins, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Steven_Carmody, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Derek Atkins, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Steven_Carmody, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Steven_Carmody, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Derek Atkins, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Steven_Carmody, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Derek Atkins, 06/06/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Steven_Carmody, 06/05/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Derek Atkins, 06/05/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, Steven_Carmody, 06/05/2003
- Re: testing the one-hop validation scenario, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 06/05/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.