shibboleth-dev - Re: Vetting an error message
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "David L. Wasley" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: Vetting an error message
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:51:16 -0800
Hmm... UI issues are the hardest part, I think, because one has to think like so many others think. What strikes me about the draft below is that it sounds like we're talking to each other and in a different universe from most others.
How about something more like:
----------------------
We were unable to contact your authorization provider and therefore cannot grant access to you at this time. Please contact your provider's help desk or office for assistance. Be sure to describe the site you are trying to use, the time at which this problem occurred, and the location from which you are working.
Shib Site name:_____________ Current Date and Time: ______________ [tzone]
----------------------
That last line would help the user talk to their support folks. They could even print the web page and take it with them!
FWIW,
David
-----
At 6:38 PM -0500 on 3/4/03, Scott Cantor wrote:
We've been fixing a bug and establishing a default error message for any time the AA returns a non-XML response, which usually
happens when the AA is broken for some reason.
Walter and I settled on this:
We were unable to contact your identity provider and cannot grant access at this time. Please contact your provider's help desk or
administrator so that the appropriate steps can be taken. Be sure to describe what you're trying to access and useful context like
the current time.
We both like identity provider as the least objectionable term, but express any concerns now before we ship.
-- Scott
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--
- Vetting an error message, Scott Cantor, 03/04/2003
- Re: Vetting an error message, David L. Wasley, 03/04/2003
- RE: Vetting an error message, Scott Cantor, 03/05/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Vetting an error message, Michael A. Grady, 03/04/2003
- RE: Vetting an error message, Scott Cantor, 03/05/2003
- Re: Vetting an error message, David L. Wasley, 03/04/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.