Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] Also the Centos Toolkit RPM no longer loads the Optional Packages by default.

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] Also the Centos Toolkit RPM no longer loads the Optional Packages by default.


Chronological Thread 
    < Chronological >      < Thread >
  • From: Andrew Lake <>
  • To: Phil Reese <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Also the Centos Toolkit RPM no longer loads the Optional Packages by default.
  • Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:01:45 -0700
Hi Phil,

We ran into a couple issues with our build infrastructure during the el7 RPM deploy, so perfsonar-common and a couple other rpms got dropped. Everything should be there now.

WRT "Optional Packages weren't loaded”, what exactly do you mean? On a toolkit install all the “optional packages” as they are called in the docs are requirements of the RPM and installed by default. They are only “optional" for the non-toolkit bundles (e.g. testpoint). There used to be a helper script that we dropped in favor of directly using yum (or def on EL8 and EL9) primarily because it was not compatible with EL8 and EL9 and one can just run the yum/dnf commands directly.

Thanks,
Andy


On June 21, 2023 at 7:28:45 PM, Phil Reese () wrote:

I grabbed the 5.0.2 version of prefsonar-common and I was then able to
complete the 5.0.3 Toolkit install.

Once installed, I see that the Optional Packages weren't loaded.

Not sure if that was because of the hack it did or some other issue.

Just reporting things I'm seeing.

Phil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: https://lists.internet2.edu/sympa/signoff/perfsonar-user

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page