Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] throughput tests with ethr

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] throughput tests with ethr


Chronological Thread 
    < Chronological >      < Thread >
  • From: Raul Lopes <>
  • To: "" <>, Raul Lopes <>
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] throughput tests with ethr
  • Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 12:29:16 +0000
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jisc.ac.uk; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=jisc.ac.uk; dkim=pass header.d=jisc.ac.uk; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=hmoOyF4eIkXLNLkUcK2FZLhB8rjnfTAMimRm9+arI2E=; b=cPHlqJD8ZvVBFpj7s5oYKzm+BDgNwJ745xBKrQ9MJpjIyAp5QiOi3s38kVNibSqNoR1udBj+ahv/bVJXw+4WXRmR5YQMJdNuM4JtxeDbxizXzYpLk9DgfGGF8qXIalf13YvSuitnSOx6nVxIWjK3OTAsLAH1IL0WaXabXZtH+b/y5gG57g30pJfxXJOxtq+g7hNr71FTH8ofGjNHU6+Jw70h8BrZF+FplPPtIEA8oAwsXV8rT4k30cMbdUhwIjADD2RPUt2AiYps/tirE8c2ob7ouZqe7KNctjBWtFe6lmXlI/OowyqgVW0g2AvO1/rYpMpL5jqwc5dQqcgt2Ywpsg==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=oJf3txp3GnR5XNiitrKmTbQAeOOQfmr1h/s55ToeiAOAgaWDl5wcIRXcV+HcUoT5B5eR1SoBvWD49Gl6GACu+H884el+tb5jeLNr9NHp8K0h6g3hVt8e88u5lMr4MwWjuGiiBgJ9sS/8vLSj54nz+oWpmOczq2skQr1AEyEJylndKMErbp6jfcpdOm3DPJkMvVDdK01b6axjHfQ+8Y+Lw/rb6TiGd/acKh/sm5QMEYpYeItwWZsDYE7ei0MKtYmFgjww6ITZbDHkPvkUC0UllQOfWi4cnPxRFPzgA6U2lw7urdMj2Mhkeh2Q6vTJlZ5w/bKh82vKf2/eiJURqsy51w==
  • Suggested_attachment_session_id: 725c6ed5-d86c-ed84-3e3a-bd4531c6f0a2
Hi,

Sorry for the noise. It  was failing  because one of the hosts had an old version of perSONAR. it works for pscheduler 4.3.x and 4.4.x

Regards, Raul
From: <> on behalf of Raul Lopes <>
Sent: 18 November 2021 11:53
To: <>
Subject: [perfsonar-user] throughput tests with ethr
 
Hi,

Is it possible to run pscheduler throughput tests with ethr?

The documentation doesn't indicate it is supported, but pscheduler indicates it is, however it seems to use the wrong ports.

When I choose --tool ethr, pscheduler gives me

  Tool standard output:
 
  None
 
  Tool standard error:
 
  Traceback (most recent call last):
    File "/usr/libexec/pscheduler/classes/tool/ethr/run", line 50, in <module>
      server_port = participant_data[1]['server_port']
  KeyError: 'server_port'
 
 

Diagnostics from 200.0.206.71:
  ethr -s -ports tcp=5201
  \Exited: 0


It is trying the iperf3 port.

Regards, Raul


Jisc is a registered charity (number 1149740) and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under company number. 05747339, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. Jisc’s registered office is: 4 Portwall Lane, Bristol, BS1 6NB. T 0203 697 5800.

Jisc Services Limited is a wholly owned Jisc subsidiary and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under company number 02881024, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. The registered office is: 4 Portwall Lane, Bristol, BS1 6NB. T 0203 697 5800.

Jisc Commercial Limited is a wholly owned Jisc subsidiary and a company limited by shares which is registered in England under company number 09316933, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. The registered office is: 4 Portwall Lane, Bristol, BS1 6NB. T 0203 697 5800.

For more details on how Jisc handles your data see our privacy notice here: https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page