perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

[Jean-Michel Barbet <>]

On 9/8/21 11:02 PM, Mark Feit wrote:
> [...]  The only explanation I can come up with for
> what Jean-Michel is seeing is that the system being upgraded is 4.2.3 or 
> earlier or 4.2.4 with jq-1.6.10-1.  There’s a 4.4.2 in the pipeline with 
> some minor changes; I’ve bumped jq to 1.6.10-3 so packages on older 
> systems are forced into the right state when that upgrade occurs.

Hello Mark, Marian,

I probably skipped some updates, so never had the opportunity to get
jq version 1.6.10-2.

To keep it simple, I could very well install manually jq-1.6.10-2, now
that I know where to find it or just wait for jq-1.6.10-3 to come with
the next release.

The annoyance is very little, I just wanted to report as it may be
troubling for some people.

BTW, I do not know what were the modifications made to jq that need
a special version instead of EPEL's default... Would it be possible
to use again EPEL's jq if the modifications have been integrated ?

Thank you

JM




--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jean-michel BARBET                    | Tel: +33 (0)2 51 85 84 86
Laboratoire SUBATECH Nantes France    | Fax: +33 (0)2 51 85 84 79
CNRS-IN2P3/IMT-Atlantique/Univ.Nantes | E-Mail: 
------------------------------------------------------------------------