perfsonar-user - RE: [perfsonar-user] Packet Retransmission on Centos 7
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: "Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE)" <>
- To: Tao Zhang <>, Michael Johnson <>
- Cc: "" <>
- Subject: RE: [perfsonar-user] Packet Retransmission on Centos 7
- Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 10:49:03 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, de-DE, en-US
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
Hi Tao, IMHO there is a bit of a misunderstanding here. perfSONAR toolkit is not a measurement tool. pS is a measurement framework, which can coordinate measurements
of multiple measurement tools and much more. perfSONAR toolkit indeed provides some kernel and interface optimizations out of the box, but these are still generic and there is no such one-size-fits-all
solution. After all you are reaching 10G. You will have to go in the details and reach for the respective tool maintainers (depending on the tool you use) to get a clear understanding on the discrepancy
you observe. The difference between CentOS 6.9 and CentOS 7 is not only about the kernel. It is also about the drivers of the NIC. Regards, Ivan Garnizov GEANT SA1T2: pS deployments GN Operations GEANT SA2T3: pS development team GEANT SA3T5: eduPERT team From: [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Tao Zhang Hi Michael,
Thanks for the reply. We are testing with the new try-before-purchase Dell servers (R430). We have installed the perfSONAR Toolkit (pS-Toolkit-4.X-CentOS7-FullInstall-x86_64.iso)
on the boxes. We constantly have these retransmissions. Based on the results, we are not confident to buy 40 new Dell servers and redeploy the perfSONAR nodes in our network. Because we
are not sure it’s a hardware or software problem. (If we install Centos 6.9 with latest perfSONAR Toolkit, we don’t get these transmissions.) We are really running out of ideas. We are thinking of connecting 2 servers back-to-back to eliminate the network issues and testing again, to see if the retransmission remains. Any suggestions? Tao Zhang Network Engineer | CANARIE Inc | 45 O'Connor St., Suite 500, Ottawa, ON K1P 1A4 │CANARIE NOC: 613-944-5612│www.canarie.ca From:
Michael Johnson <> Hi Tao, It's true that there are more EL6 hosts out there than EL7. However, most of the development testing is now taking place on CentOS 7, and it is fully supported. I believe the reason you're seeing discrepancies is because CentOS 7 has a different kernel, which sometimes handles things a bit differently. In addition to that, the most recent versions of iperf3 have some relevant changes as well. The
end result is that we are getting better at detecting packet retransmissions we weren't seeing before (this is consistent with the behavior we've seen in testing). That's my understanding, anyway. I hope this helps! Thanks, Michael Johnson GlobalNOC Software Engineering Indiana University 812-856-2771 Hi perfSONAR community, As we are planning to redeploy our perfSONAR nodes, we have done thorough tests among our perfSONAR boxes. All the nodes are running perfSONAR Toolkit v4.0.0.1. Here are the throughput test results:
It looks like the perfSONAR 4.0 doesn’t work very well with Centos 7. I checked the
perfSONAR Lookup Service Directory and found that most nodes are still running on Centos 6.9. I suspect that it may be the reason the problem is not fully exposed. Anyone has similar problems? Thanks Tao Zhang Network Engineer | CANARIE Inc | 45 O'Connor St., Suite 500, Ottawa, ON K1P 1A4 │CANARIE NOC: 613-944-5612│www.canarie.ca |
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Packet Retransmission on Centos 7, Tao Zhang, 08/04/2017
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Packet Retransmission on Centos 7, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 08/07/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Packet Retransmission on Centos 7, Tao Zhang, 08/22/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Packet Retransmission on Centos 7, Thomas Tam, 08/23/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Packet Retransmission on Centos 7, Andrew Lake, 08/23/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Packet Retransmission on Centos 7, Thomas Tam, 08/23/2017
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Packet Retransmission on Centos 7, Tao Zhang, 08/22/2017
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Packet Retransmission on Centos 7, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 08/07/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.