Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - [perfsonar-user] powstream, misleading log entries

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

[perfsonar-user] powstream, misleading log entries


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jon Clausen <>
  • To:
  • Subject: [perfsonar-user] powstream, misleading log entries
  • Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 10:54:10 +0200
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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

Hi

I'm a perfSONAR newbie, working towards setting up a mesh of four nodes and
a measurement archive.

The nodes are meant to become 'public' at a later stage, but for now I just
want to have the setup running, to learn how everything works.

At this point I'm still not sure which questions to ask, but I wanted to
offer up one bit of info that I came across.


The nodes are all CentOS 7, with the 'perfsonar-testpoint' package.
Mesh is configured (json built and available to the nodes) and the nodes
seem to be (trying to) run the tests defined.

In /var/log/messages I would see:

Aug 4 09:44:21 dk-ore-pstp01 powstream[31833]:
OWPControlOpen([fi-csc-pstp01-mi1.nordu.net]:861): Couldn't open 'control'
connection to server: No route to host

Now, I *know* the routing works, so this had me scratching my head for a
while, until I decided that the logged message was 'wrong'.

As it turns out, the firewall on fi-csc-pstp01 was dropping the traffic. As
soon as I ran the following (to allow access from our prefix) the entries in
/var/log/messages ceased:

[jac@fi-csc-pstp01 ~]$ sudo firewall-cmd --add-rich-rule 'rule family="ipv4"
source address="109.105.96.0/19" service name="owamp-control" accept'
success


Now, I *think* this classifies as a bug, because the logged info is actively
misleading. But it's going to be a while before I'd be able to identify
which component to report the bug against.

So this is basically just an attempt to make this bit of info available.

Maybe, actually, a couple of pointers on how to submit bug reports?

br
/jon

--

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page