Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR tests to AWS?

Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

List archive

Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR tests to AWS?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Bill Owens <>
  • To: Michael Smitasin <>, Mark Feit <>, Eli Dart <>, "Steven G. Huter" <>
  • Cc: Hyojoon Kim <>, perfsonar-user <>
  • Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] perfSONAR tests to AWS?
  • Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 18:53:52 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: lbl.gov; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lbl.gov; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nysernet.org;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

Something like this? https://federatedcloud.org/

Bill.

On 4/5/17, 2:35 PM,
"
on behalf of Michael Smitasin"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:

> Some service providers have language in their user agreements that
forbid disclosure of observed performance to third parties.

*ponders implications of an R&E-focused VPS initiative* Anyone have an
unused datacenter or 5?

Michael Smitasin
Principal Network Engineer
LBLnet Services Group
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory


On 4/5/2017 6:41 AM, Mark Feit wrote:
> Eli Dart writes:
>
> It would be interesting to have a conversation with Amazon about
expected data transfer performance numbers for different types of AWS
instances, using different technologies (HTTP, Globus S3 connector, etc).
>
> Do you think they might be receptive to something like this?
>
> I hate to be the thrower of cold water, but it’s likely to be a very
short conversation.
>
> Unlike R&E, which has every reason to share this kind of thing in the
interest of furthering research; businesses have every reason to play their
cards very close to their chests for competitive advantage. They also tend
to be intentionally vague about performance because the
oversubscription-based business model makes it unpredictable. (Measurement
in a rent-a-box environment has a long list of pitfalls and will probably be
the subject of something I write in the future because it seems to be of
interest to a lot of people.)
>
> There would be no business case for installing dedicated measurement
machines because the cost relative to the return wouldn’t be worth it. They
may do this internally, but it’s done as part of their monitoring
infrastructure and isn’t going to be available for us to run perfSONAR. I
should also note that Amazon does have a partnership with Rackspace to offer
instances on dedicated systems, but they’re (predictably) expensive and
probably don’t share EC2’s infrastructure.
>
> One other thing to consider: Some service providers have language in
their user agreements that forbid disclosure of observed performance to third
parties. It would be wise to consult your agreements with Amazon and others
before having these discussions in any detail or making rented instances part
of a publicly-visible dashboard to avoid running afoul of the terms.
>
> --Mark
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page