perfsonar-user - RE: [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Andrew Lake <>
- To: , Rade Martinović <>
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash
- Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:09:49 -0400
Hi Mike, Also, the larger question you should consider is what are you hoping to derive from a latency dashboard with a bunch of owamp nodes this close together. As mentioned it’s a well-known fact (and been a matter of hot debate lately) that OWAMP measurements, due to their reliance on NTP, give unreliable latency results for nodes in close proximity. As such such, alerting on latency isn’t probably going to tell you much for these nodes. Alerting on loss as reported by OWAMP may have some uses, but the latency values probably won’t in this case. Thanks, Andy On March 31, 2016 at 6:53:08 AM, Rade Martinović () wrote:
|
- [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash, Michael Reece, 03/30/2016
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash, Rade Martinović, 03/31/2016
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash, Rade Martinović, 03/31/2016
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash, Andrew Lake, 03/31/2016
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash, Rade Martinović, 03/31/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash, Mark Feit, 03/31/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash, Gene Gerhiser, 03/31/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash, Mark Feit, 03/31/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash, Gene Gerhiser, 03/31/2016
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash, Larry Blunk, 03/31/2016
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Negative Latency Times on MaDDash, Rade Martinović, 03/31/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.