perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

[Matthew J Zekauskas <>]

The current chair is Ken Miller, I've cc'd him on this reply.   Feel 
free to follow up with him, or with me if you think I can be of help.  
(I'm not positive who the current Internet2 flywheel for the group is, 
but am happy to help out..)

--Matt


On 2/19/16 5:29 PM, Magorian, Daniel F. wrote:
> Got it, thanks for the clarification, and apologies for misinterpreting.
>
> I hope to write it up to serve both an educational function and as the 
> mission statement of a new parallel LAN measurement task area.
>
> What I could use is some help in how to make that new Performance Measurement 
> Group task area happen.  Probably need to talk to some I2 folks for that.
>
> Dan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Boolootian 
> [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 5:25 PM
> To: Magorian, Daniel F.
> Cc: Alan Whinery; 
> ;
>  Jason Zurawski; Andrew Gallo
> Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] feedback on PTP
>
> > > It's the very lack of such documentation that helps propel
> > > this thread along
> > I'll ignore the fact that was basically a rude swipe on a public
> > list by someone who obviously doesn't like what I'm proposing.
> Dan - I'm sorry, that wasn't my intent at all.  The fact is, I don't know
> enough to know whether I shouldn't like your proposal or not.  In
> point of fact, I'm quite interested in what you've said in this thread.
>
> > Frequently when people ask you to write white papers, it's a
> > not-very-subtle way to get them to shut up and go away and
> > waste their time.
> Not at all.  I want you to educate me so that I understand.  A
> white paper could be tremendously helpful in that regard.
>
> mark