perfsonar-user - [perfsonar-user] Re: regular_testing esmond error events
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Andrew Lake <>
- To: "Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE)" <>
- Cc: perfsonar-user <>
- Subject: [perfsonar-user] Re: regular_testing esmond error events
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:30:03 -0500
Hi Ivan, When you look at the graphs On January 12, 2016 at 12:33:50 PM, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE) () wrote:
When you look at the graphs do you see any missing data? or does MaDDash report any orange? That’s probably the easiest way.
The standard logging practice is WARN means something non-fatal thatc an generally be ignored and ERROR means something is broken. I can’t say that regular_testing is always consistent with these. It should also be noted that regular_testing will try to re-register data later even if it gets an ERROR, so its not an indication that your data din;t get registered.
Probably. I would not use the logs as an indication that you are missing data. I would look at the graphs or rely on your dashboard to tell you that.
|
- [perfsonar-user] regular_testing esmond error events, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 01/12/2016
- [perfsonar-user] Re: regular_testing esmond error events, Andrew Lake, 01/14/2016
- [perfsonar-user] RE: regular_testing esmond error events, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 01/14/2016
- [perfsonar-user] RE: regular_testing esmond error events, Andrew Lake, 01/14/2016
- [perfsonar-user] RE: regular_testing esmond error events, Garnizov, Ivan (RRZE), 01/14/2016
- [perfsonar-user] Re: regular_testing esmond error events, Andrew Lake, 01/14/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.