perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] Non-Java NDT or Toolkit in general update?
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: "Florio, Christopher N" <>
- To: Aaron Brown <>
- Cc: Clarke Morledge <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Non-Java NDT or Toolkit in general update?
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:11:30 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
Add me to the list of folks that would love to see a non-java based NDT.
I've got a lot of users unable to run NDT with the latest java.
On Oct 8, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Aaron Brown
<>
wrote:
> Hey Clarke,
>
> On Oct 7, 2014, at 5:08 PM, Clarke Morledge
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> The whole Bash shell-shock crisis has urged us to reconsider how we are
>> deploying the pS-Performance Toolkit.
>>
>> The suite of tools have proven helpful over the years, but with the
>> apparent coming demise of Java as a general use platform, a lot of the
>> ease of use in troubleshooting problems for novice users has lost its
>> luster. Maintaining Java has become quite cumbersome and the iPhone
>> restrictions are pronounced, whereas in our experience, Flash, JavaScript
>> and HTML5 appear to be thriving better. Even with efforts to load up Java
>> on those systems that support it, the cut and paste capability has long
>> since been broken for statistics.
>>
>> There was an update regarding the status of an HTML5 front-end for the
>> Network Diagnostic Tool back in July, but unless I am mistaken, I do not
>> see much movement on this.
>>
>> Overall, I would like to know more about any plans to move the toolkit
>> tool set off of Java. At least, it would be good to get an update on NDT.
>>
>> Essentially, we are still looking for a web-based and relatively easy to
>> use utility that is fairly OS independent that any novice can use from a
>> desktop, laptop, or handheld device for running general purpose network
>> diagnostics. Iperf, BWCTL, etc. all are great for powerusers, but I am
>> thinking more in terms of relatively simple tools for the non-geeks.
>
> There is a flash-based web UI for NDT that’s planned for a soon-ish release
> candidate. The current stumbling block is more on the packaging side than
> anything else. The downside to the Flash-based interface is that it has
> some performance issues which can be exacerbated depending on the flash
> platform (e.g. windows vs. linux or chrome vs. firefox). There are some
> plans to try to improve its performance, but it may not work all that well
> for 1G connected hosts.
>
> In the medium or long term, the plan is to look into rewriting the NDT
> functionality to fix some of these underlying issues where possible. We’re
> having a meeting later this month where, among other topics, we’re going to
> discuss plans for the NDT rewrite.
>
> Cheers,
> Aaron
>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Clarke Morledge
>> College of William and Mary
>> Information Technology - Network Engineering
>> Jones Hall (Room 18)
>> Williamsburg VA 23187
>
- [perfsonar-user] Non-Java NDT or Toolkit in general update?, Clarke Morledge, 10/07/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Non-Java NDT or Toolkit in general update?, Aaron Brown, 10/08/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Non-Java NDT or Toolkit in general update?, Florio, Christopher N, 10/28/2014
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Non-Java NDT or Toolkit in general update?, Aaron Brown, 10/08/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.