perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Eli Dart <>
- To: Alan Whinery <>,
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:07:21 -0700
- Organization: Energy Sciences Network
On 10/16/13 9:46 AM, Alan Whinery wrote:
You might also reveal something useful by using periodic reports in your
bwctl invocations (like " -i 1 ") you may find that the per second
reports show burstiness, or the lack of it.
I find this to be very very helpful.
There is a big difference between a clean ramp to a stable speed, and wild fluctuation that is averaged.
A clean ramp to a stable speed argues against the presence of packet loss. If performance is poor but stable, I would check the hosts and the application, and then check for a clean bottleneck link. Wild fluctuation points toward loss - check your router and switch buffers. (And if "poor but stable" means fluctuating between 10Kbps and 30Kbps, there is probably loss too :)
None of this is set in stone of course. However, I find that telling bwctl to give periodic reports is very helpful indeed.
--eli
On 10/16/2013 6:26 AM, Wefel, Paul wrote:
Couple ideas
Run owamp between these two hosts looking for packet loss in only one
direction.
Check the switch interface that Dst is connected to looking for queue
drops and pause frames being sent.
I have also seen strange issues with some NICS when offloading is enabled
on them.
good luck, let us know what you find.
-paul
NCSA @ UIUC
-----Original Message-----
From: Roderick Mooi
<>
Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 5:07 AM
To:
""
<>,
""
<>
Subject: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements
Hi>from a 10 G interface to a 1 G interface which was subsequently being
I have been trying to locate the cause of inconsistent measurements
between two nodes for a few weeks now without success. The pattern I'm
seeing is available at:
https://192.96.2.247/serviceTest/bandwidthGraph.cgi?url=http://localhost:8
085/perfSONAR_PS/services/pSB&key=d9013ce7df20b8bbe45defeaeae785d6&keyR=0a
0ed6c928edf28976414a2cc7e87d6f&dstIP=192.96.2.247&srcIP=196.21.48.249&dst=
192.96.2.247&src=perfsonara.sanren.ac.za&type=TCP&length=2592000
Src-Dst is consistent but Dst-Src is not.
Manual tests (attached) show the same behaviour without any indication of
cause - measures 941 Mbps then drops to 189 Mbps (end) and back to 941
(nothing different in the logs between "good" measurements and "bad"
ones). The only time I've seen something similar is when I was testing
flooded. In this case both interfaces are 1 G. I'm also not seeing any
problems with measurements along the path or between these nodes and any
other nodes. Additionally, there is very little (< 50 Mbps) real traffic
between these 2 nodes.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Roderick
--
Roderick Mooi | SANREN Engineer
--
| +27 12 841 4111 | www.sanren.ac.za
--
This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions,
e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard.
The full disclaimer details can be found at
http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html.
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner,
and is believed to be clean.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
--
Eli Dart, Network Engineer NOC: (510) 486-7600
ESnet Office of the CTO (AS293) (800) 333-7638
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
PGP Key fingerprint = C970 F8D3 CFDD 8FFF 5486 343A 2D31 4478 5F82 B2B3
- Re: [perfsonar-user] migrating to new box?, (continued)
- Re: [perfsonar-user] migrating to new box?, Jim Warner, 10/18/2013
- [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] Perfsonar Server got hacked (non root user), Brian Tierney, 10/10/2013
- [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] Perfsonar Server got hacked (non root user), Jim Warner, 10/10/2013
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] Perfsonar Server got hacked (non root user), Jason Zurawski, 10/11/2013
- [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] Perfsonar Server got hacked (non root user), Soichi Hayashi, 10/11/2013
- [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements, Roderick Mooi, 10/16/2013
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements, Brian Tierney, 10/16/2013
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements, Jason Zurawski, 10/16/2013
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements, Wefel, Paul, 10/16/2013
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements, Alan Whinery, 10/16/2013
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements, Eli Dart, 10/16/2013
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements, Roderick Mooi, 10/17/2013
- Message not available
- Re: [perf-node-users] Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements, Jason Zurawski, 10/17/2013
- Re: [perf-node-users] Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements, Roderick Mooi, 10/17/2013
- Re: [perf-node-users] Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements, Jason Zurawski, 10/17/2013
- [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] Perfsonar Server got hacked (non root user), Jason Zurawski, 10/11/2013
- Message not available
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements, Eli Dart, 10/17/2013
- Message not available
- [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] Perfsonar Server got hacked (non root user), Jim Warner, 10/10/2013
- Re: [perfsonar-user] Help with inconsistent bwctl measurements, Roderick Mooi, 10/17/2013
- [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] Perfsonar Server got hacked (non root user), Roderick Mooi, 10/16/2013
- RE: [perfsonar-user] Re: [perf-node-users] Perfsonar Server got hacked (non root user), Garnizov, Ivan, 10/16/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.