perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

[Brian Tierney <>]

Fausto:

I'd also like to point out that we find the new sLS *much* more reliable and 
faster than the old hLS/gLS, so
I'd strongly recommend that you use the sLS instead.


On Oct 11, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Sowmya Balasubramanian 
<>
 wrote:

> Hi Fausto,
> 
> The pS-pS community is using the Simple Lookup Service(sLS). The toolkits 
> have already been modified to use sLS. So, if you download the latest 
> toolkit/upgrade, your toolkit will have the ability to register to sLS. 
> Also, I believe some of your clients have already been integrated with sLS.
> 
> For backward compatibility, we do provide a script that translates hLS/gLS 
> data to sLS. So, if you use the sLS, you will have access to all the new 
> toolkits registering with sLS and the older toolkits that register to 
> hLS/gLS.
> 
> And, If you are interested in deploying sLS, here is the link to the rpm: 
> http://software.internet2.edu/rpms/i386/main/RPMS/simple-lookup-service-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
> The installation instructions can be found here: 
> https://code.google.com/p/simple-lookup-service/wiki/sLSInstallation
> 
> Let me know if you have any questions. I will be happy to answer them.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sowmya
> 
> On 10/10/13 8:12 AM, Antoine Delvaux wrote:
>> Hi Fausto!
>> 
>> From the pS-MDM side, only the hLS/gLS flavour is in use at the moment. 
>> The MDM services are only registering there and our visualization tool 
>> only uses the services listed in this LS network (along with some static 
>> listed ones). 
>> 
>> There might be a one-way bridge (hLS/gLS -> simple LS) between the two 
>> lists though, but that I'm not sure about. 
>> 
>> Hope all is well for you!
>> 
>> Cheers!
>> 
>> -- Antoine --
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 10 oct. 2013 à 09:03, "Fausto Vetter" 
>>> <>
>>>  a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Following this thread about the integration to the Lookup Service, I was 
>>> wondering what are the requirements to deploy a Lookup Service.
>>> 
>>> We are considering to deploy a Lookup Service on our side, but we need to 
>>> know which is the current implementation that needs to be considered. Is 
>>> this implementation supported by the toolkit as well? Has this 
>>> implementation been used as base for our integration work?
>>> 
>>> As by now we have at least 2 implementations of the LS (the Simple LS and 
>>> the Local/Global LS), which one should we use? Could you please send us 
>>> the right pointers to the updated how-tos?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Fausto Vetter
>>> 
>>> Diretoria de Pesquisa & Desenvolvimento (DPD) / Research & Development 
>>> Department
>>> Gerência de Redes para Experimentos (GRE) / Management of Network for 
>>> Experiments
>>> RNP – Rede Nacional de Ensino e Pesquisa
>>> 
>>> http://www.rnp.br
>>> 
>>> Telefone: +55 (21) 2102 9696
>>> E-mail: 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Mensagem original -----
>>> De: "Sowmya Balasubramanian" 
>>> <>
>>> 
>>> Para: "Murilo Vetter" 
>>> <>
>>> 
>>> Cc: "Andy Lake" 
>>> <>,
>>>  "''Comunicação com os desenvolvedores do projeto MONIPE''" 
>>> <>,
>>>  
>>> ,
>>>  
>>> ,
>>>  "''SE-Cipó Desenvolvimento''" 
>>> <>
>>> 
>>> Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 12 de Agosto de 2013 13:00:41
>>> Assunto: Re: [se-cipo-des] RES: RES: [perfsonar-user] RES: RES: RES: RES: 
>>> RES: RES: RES: RES: [Monipe-des] Fwd: lookup service docs
>>> 
>>> Hi Murilo,
>>> 
>>> You need to add the group-communities keyword to the service record.
>>> 
>>> Sowmya
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 8/9/13 1:17 PM, Murilo Vetter wrote:
>>>> Hi Andy,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for your help. Now it should work this integration. It appeared in
>>>> Toolkit.
>>>> I would like to know how to get the communities register in LS?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks again,
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Se-cipo-des mailing list
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://listas.rnp.br/mailman/listinfo/se-cipo-des
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>