perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion

[Brian Tierney <>]

I discussed this briefly with Michael Sinatra a while back, and I think we 
agreed it might
be a good idea.

Do you have some specific suggestions on what would be most useful here?

BTW: ESnet has no plans to reduce its commitment to perfSONAR.

On May 23, 2013, at 12:28 PM, "Buraglio, Nicholas D" 
<>
 wrote:

> Has there been any thought into incorporating the NLNog ring toolkit ( 
> https://ring.nlnog.net/toolbox/ ) into perfSonar?  Setting up a ring node 
> got me thinking about how this could be a potentially useful add-in to the 
> perfSonar toolkit (and be one less host to maintain).  Admittedly it is a 
> bit of a different set of features, however, being able to utilize the ring 
> tools could be very useful for those that don't meet the requirements for 
> becoming a ring node.  It could also potentially add a very large set of 
> existing test and data points available to a far larger audience.  
> I know that the development future of perfSonar is a bit up in the air, 
> this could be a possible mechanism keeping perfSonar in the forefront of 
> use.  
> 
> nb
> 
> ---
> Nick Buraglio
> Lead Network Engineer
> University of Illinois
> P: 217.244.6428
> 
> AS38 AS40387 AS10932 AS32698