perfsonar-user - Re: [perfsonar-user] bi-directional?
Subject: perfSONAR User Q&A and Other Discussion
List archive
- From: Jason Zurawski <>
- To: jim warner <>
- Cc: , Performance Node Users <>
- Subject: Re: [perfsonar-user] bi-directional?
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:38:57 -0500
- Organization: Internet2
On 12/14/10 5:57 AM, jim warner wrote:
On 12/13/2010 5:19 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
This field indicates if BWCTL was able to test bandwidth in each==
direction: from your host to the remote host, and from the remote host
to your host. I will add both of these clarifications to the FAQ.
Thanks. I'll note that this is the only field on that screen that
presents a *result*. The rest of the columns contain test parameters.
That is a curious design choice. While documentation always helps, I
suggest that column should be dropped in the interest of consistency and
clarity in the next release. If the test is only working in one
direction, this will show up in the bar graphs just below the parameter
display -- assuming the site labels are large enough to be read.
It would, I think, be helpful if the values in the Window column said
"auto" instead of using a blank column to indicate that auto-tuning is
in effect. And some indication like "N.A." for the bandwidth column
might make sense for TCP tests.
I will make a note of each of these enhancements.
At Santa Cruz we don't set the window size so I went looking for
perfsonar instances that do. The one I found (130.126.0.109) shows a
window size of "3" for all tests. I was expecting to see something in KB
or MB. It would be a good addition to the documentation to explain what
is in this column.
Good catch, I will file a bug on this issue to be sure we are including a units designation.
Thanks;
-jason
- [perfsonar-user] bi-directional?, jim warner, 12/13/2010
- Re: [perfsonar-user] bi-directional?, Jason Zurawski, 12/13/2010
- Re: [perfsonar-user] bi-directional?, jim warner, 12/14/2010
- Re: [perfsonar-user] bi-directional?, Jason Zurawski, 12/14/2010
- Re: [perfsonar-user] bi-directional?, jim warner, 12/14/2010
- Re: [perfsonar-user] bi-directional?, Jason Zurawski, 12/13/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.