perfsonar development work

[Nicolas Simar <>]

Hi,

can you please all vote for the solution to be followed, so we can conclude.

Cheers,
Nicolas

Stijn Melis wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I just checked my service, and at the moment I have option D instead of
> option A, like Cándido :s I presume it is best that I wait for a
> decision to be reached before I make a change, right?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Stijn
> 
> Cándido Rodríguez Montes wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm trying to summarize the options:
>> A) Put pS services at /opt/perfsonar/services/<name_of_the_service>.
>> Also, there are symbolic links at /etc/<name_of_the_service>,
>> /var/log/<name_of_the_service> and /usr/share/doc/<name_of_the_service>.
>> B) Put pS services at
>> /var/lib/perfsonar/services/<name_of_the_service>. Also, there are
>> symbolic links at /etc/<name_of_the_service>,
>> /var/log/<name_of_the_service> and /usr/share/doc/<name_of_the_service>.
>> C) Put pS services at
>> /usr/lib/perfsonar/services/<name_of_the_service>. Also, there are
>> symbolic links at /etc/<name_of_the_service>,
>> /var/log/<name_of_the_service> and /usr/share/doc/<name_of_the_service>.
>> D) Put pS services at
>> /var/lib/tomcat5(.5)/webapps/<name_of_the_service>. Also, config files
>> are at /etc/<name_of_the_service>, logs files at
>> /var/log/<name_of_the_service> and documentation at
>> /usr/share/doc/<name_of_the_service>.
>>
>> We should decide which option we like. Also, there is another
>> interesting question: if we move from (A) to another option, it will
>> be for 3.1 or the next release?
>>
>> I agree with Stijn we cannot change every day the paths, but, if
>> everybody is happy with the option (B) and we don't violate any
>> packaging standards or any other technical agreement we should release
>> a new RC with this change ASAP, so it can be included in the beta
>> testing process. The good news is, after this agreement, we're not
>> going to modify the paths anymore ;)
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> El 24/09/2008, a las 11:01, Stijn Melis escribió:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> because I'm no expert on unix filesystems, I don't really have an
>>> opinion on this. I'm fine with it either way, as long as I don't have
>>> to change the paths every few days because something else gets decided.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Stijn
>>>
>>>> I think Gijs's comment is very important and reasonable. In my
>>>> opinion we can accept the proposal to move all stuff to
>>>> /var/lib/perfsonar directory.
>>>> It's not a big change but as Gijs said does not violate packaging
>>>> standards.
>>>> Please service developers and release team, send your comments. We
>>>> need the final agreement very soon.
>>>> Thanks Gijs for your input!
>>>> Roman
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Cándido Rodríguez Montes E-mail: 
>> 
>> <mailto:>
>> Middleware warrior Tel:+34 955 05 66 13
>> Red.ES/RedIRIS
>> Edificio CICA
>> Avenida Reina Mercedes, s/n
>> 41012 Sevilla
>> SPAIN
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 

-- 
Nicolas
______________________________________________________________________

Nicolas Simar
Network Engineer

DANTE - www.dante.net

Tel - BE: +32 (0) 4 366 93 49
Tel - UK: +44 (0)1223 371 300
Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 176 883

City House, 126-130 Hills Road
Cambridge CB2 1PQ
UK
_____________________________________________________________________