perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Joe Metzger <>
- To: Loukik Kudarimoti <>
- Cc: , Maciej Glowiak <>, Perfsonar Development <>
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:34:51 -0600
Loukik,
I think we need to lag behind major Linux distributions by at least 6-12 months
to facilitate installation and adoption. According to my Unix Administration
team, several major linux distributions are still at 1.4. So, I don't think we
should move to 1.6 for a couple years unless we have a critical functionality
requirement.
--Joe
On Jan 29, 2008, at 10:31 AM, Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
Jason Zurawski wrote:
Hi Maciej;I wouldn't say its high time just because its been two years. But, I agree with you that we should investigate this option thoroughly. If there are real benefits to switch, we should do so.
Two years ago we started using Java 1.5.
Isn't it the high time to switch to Java 1.6?
Example of a benefit would be the native SOAP support from Java (possibly no need for axis) that Nina mentioned in Rome. Of course, this may or may not be useful to us but thats exactly what we want to investigate.
Is there any particular reason for switching to 1.5 over 1.6 (a newIndeed. All the points Jason mentioned have to be taken into account. So, summarizing the answer to your question depends on answers to the following :)
feature, performance improvements?), conversely what bad things will
happen if some feature used in 1.5 is not supported in 1.6. I seem to
recall some issues when the last jump between 1.4 and 1.5 was enacted.
Switching versions may cause headaches depending on where you are trying
to install as well (RHEL comes to mind, I know I am able to find builds
of most java versions for Ubuntu however).
1. How much of effort does it involve to do the following
*. Investigate the merits of using 1.6
*. Investigate the disadvantages of using 1.6
*. What effect would it have on our dependencies (RHEL being one of them)
*. Calculate the total effort and time required to switch all services and all current developments from 1.5 to 1.6
2. What real benefits do we gain by switching to 1.6? Can these benefits justify the costs mentioned in point 1?
Anybody wants to investigate?
Loukik.
.
-jason
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
L o u k i k K u d a r i m o t i
* * Network Engineer
* * City House, 126 - 130, Hills Road
* Cambridge CB2 1PQ, United Kingdom
* WWW: http://www.dante.net
D A N T E Tel:+44 1223 371300 Fax:+44 1223 371371
- Java 1.6, Maciej Glowiak, 01/29/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Jason Zurawski, 01/29/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Loukik Kudarimoti, 01/29/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Joe Metzger, 01/29/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Jochen Reinwand, 01/30/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Maciej Glowiak, 01/30/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Szymon Trocha, 01/30/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Jochen Reinwand, 01/30/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Szymon Trocha, 01/30/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Joe Metzger, 01/29/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Loukik Kudarimoti, 01/29/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Jason Zurawski, 01/29/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.