perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Szymon Trocha <>
- To: Perfsonar Development <>
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:12:54 +0100
Maciej Glowiak wrote:
I think it would be better to switch to 1.6 because of performance reasons and some advanced features, however I will wait for the decision of others.
I think there are two points of view: developers (who would probably support this change e.g. because of better performance) and users (who like Joe or Johen would like not to change the version because of maturity issues). We should consider possible impact on both parties as well as development and release process.
Regards,
--
Szymon Trocha
Poznan Supercomputing & Ntw. Center ::: NETWORK OPERATION CENTER
Tel. (+48 61) 8582022
http://noc.man.poznan.pl ::: http://noc.pionier.gov.pl
- Java 1.6, Maciej Glowiak, 01/29/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Jason Zurawski, 01/29/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Loukik Kudarimoti, 01/29/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Joe Metzger, 01/29/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Jochen Reinwand, 01/30/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Maciej Glowiak, 01/30/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Szymon Trocha, 01/30/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Jochen Reinwand, 01/30/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Szymon Trocha, 01/30/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Joe Metzger, 01/29/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Loukik Kudarimoti, 01/29/2008
- Re: [pS-dev] Java 1.6, Jason Zurawski, 01/29/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.