perfsonar development work

[Roman Lapacz <>]

Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> Jochen Reinwand wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > We recently found out that trang is not verifying the schemas!!
> > It just translates them into (equally wrong) schemas in other formats 
> > and only complains if it doesn't know how to translate them!
> >
> > Only jing will really verify the schema. So most schemas rejected by 
> > soapUI should be rejected by jing as well.
> >   
> Yes! Indeed. Whenever you write a new schema in rnc, you should verify 
> it with jing and then use trang to convert it (if required).

I just used jing to validate one of the message types 
(MeasurementArchiveStoreRequest for link status) and I go no errors. But 
Sasa send me output from soapui that it didn't work there.

Roman

> Loukik.
>
> > So this discussion might not be necessary at all. Especially because 
> > soapUI will most likely soon be able to do RNG validation directly.
> >
> > regards,
> > Jochen
> >
> > On Monday 10 December 2007 13:31, Roman Lapacz wrote:
> >  
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to describe shortly a problem in creating rnc schema files for
> > > messages used by our services. Some time ago Michalis mentioned (and
> > > uSasa recently) that soapui may not accept rnc files which are fine for
> > > trang tool. So the question is who should prepare/update soapui-aware
> > > schema files:
> > >
> > > 1. service developers or/and schema maintainers (for them trang is much
> > > simple to validate rnc's; usually they don't need to know and use 
> > > soapui)
> > > 2. testers who work with soapui in their tests (for them updating 
> > > schema
> > > files which are fine for trang but not  for soapui will be 
> > > additional work)
> > >
> > > What is your opinion on this?
> > >
> > >
> > > (or 1. could have clear instruction what structures are not allowed by
> > > soapui; with examples :)
> > >
> > > Roman
> > >     
> >
> >