perfsonar development work

[Loukik Kudarimoti <>]

Jochen Reinwand wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We recently found out that trang is not verifying the schemas!!
> It just translates them into (equally wrong) schemas in other formats and only 
> complains if it doesn't know how to translate them!
>
> Only jing will really verify the schema. So most schemas rejected by soapUI 
> should be rejected by jing as well.
>   
Yes! Indeed. Whenever you write a new schema in rnc, you should verify 
it with jing and then use trang to convert it (if required).

Loukik.

> So this discussion might not be necessary at all. Especially because soapUI 
> will most likely soon be able to do RNG validation directly.
>
> regards,
> Jochen
>
> On Monday 10 December 2007 13:31, Roman Lapacz wrote:
>   
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to describe shortly a problem in creating rnc schema files for
> > messages used by our services. Some time ago Michalis mentioned (and
> > uSasa recently) that soapui may not accept rnc files which are fine for
> > trang tool. So the question is who should prepare/update soapui-aware
> > schema files:
> >
> > 1. service developers or/and schema maintainers (for them trang is much
> > simple to validate rnc's; usually they don't need to know and use soapui)
> > 2. testers who work with soapui in their tests (for them updating schema
> > files which are fine for trang but not  for soapui will be additional work)
> >
> > What is your opinion on this?
> >
> >
> > (or 1. could have clear instruction what structures are not allowed by
> > soapui; with examples :)
> >
> > Roman
> >     
>
>   


--

---------------------------------------------------------------
L o u k i k   K u d a r i m o t i

     * *              Network Engineer
   *     *            City House, 126 - 130, Hills Road
  *                   Cambridge CB2 1PQ, United Kingdom
  *                   WWW: http://www.dante.net
D  A  N  T  E          Tel:+44 1223 371300 Fax:+44 1223 371371