perfsonar development work

[Verena Venus <>]

Hi Loukik,

Am Monday 09 July 2007 13:16 schrieb Loukik Kudarimoti:

[...]

> I think its very beneficial to have this functionality and is very easy

> to implement it (It shouldn't take more than a couple of hours). But I

> would say that its up to you guys. All services in perfsonar 2.0 (except

> bwctl mp) support this functionality.

>

In fact we do support this feature in the 0.2.1 release of our service.

> As far as a "definition of what is a proper perfSONAR service" is

> concerned, we don't have any such document yet.

> Nicolas, Szymon, any thoughts?

>

I'd like to bring up the idea of a perfSONAR validator (again), which should be easy to accomplish, now that we have the SOAP UI test projects for the services. Just extract what all these test files have in common, and you have testing script for common perfsonar services. This could also be the starting point for defining what a "proper" perfSONAR service is.

And obviously, we have a need for such a thing (see Mark and Matthias).

Kind regards,

Verena

--

Verena Venus - DFN Labor

Regionales Rechenzentrum Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg

Martensstrasse 1, D-91058 Erlangen