perfsonar development work

[Szymon Trocha <>]

Nicolas Simar pisze:

[...]
> > > I'd like to bring up the idea of a perfSONAR validator (again), which 
> > > should be easy to accomplish, now that we have the SOAP UI test 
> > > projects for the services. Just extract what all these test files 
> > > have in common, and you have testing script for common perfsonar 
> > > services. This could also be the starting point for defining what a 
> > > "proper" perfSONAR service is.
> > >
> > > And obviously, we have a need for such a thing (see Mark and Matthias).
> >
> > I take your point on the need for such a validtor. However, I think 
> > such a validator would still need a documented definition of what 
> > exactly does it need to validate (i.e., what features should it be 
> > checking for). I think we need an initial list (like echo 
> > functionality, ls registration, result codes, doc/lit style, logging, 
> > wsdl, etc)
>
> That sounds like a reasonable starting point at those functionalities 
> are used by multiple services.
>
> Loukik and Michalis, have you got an idea on how we could proceed? Can 
> we re-used some existing part of the functional tests?

For me such validation is strictly rel mgmt job and I would suggest that 
rel mgmt team works out that list based on what me and you prepare as a 
definition of pS service and knowing requirements for the next release.

Regards,
Szymon