perfsonar development work

[Loukik Kudarimoti <>]

Maciej Glowiak wrote:
> Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> > Maciej Glowiak wrote:
> > > Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> > > > umm..I am trying to understand your suggestion Maciej. I have a 
> > > > question. Are you suggesting that the rnc specification for the LS 
> > > > registration message *of a particular service* (not the LS itself) 
> > > > be split across two documents - Interface Specification of the LS 
> > > > itself and the Interface specification of the particular service?
> > >
> > > Hi Loukik,
> > >
> > > (I was pretty sure I was responsing that e-mail, but now can't find 
> > > it on perfsonar-dev.)
> > >
> > > That's exactly what I was thinking of.
> > >
> > > Maciej
> > Maciej,
> >
> > We will consider this as a proposal for change for future work. For 
> > the upcoming release, please continue as decided already.
> >
> > Further, if you can file this as a bug in bugzilla ( I have created a 
> > product for the hand over process), it would be very helpful. You can 
> > find the product here:
> > https://bugzilla.perfsonar.net/enter_bug.cgi?product=Handover%20Process
>
> Loukik, for LSRegisterRequest I had to use that way. It's impossible 
> to define schema for that request other than "sonar.rnc". I was 
> talking about it many times, but maybe it wasn't so clear.
It looks like we are talking about two different things. ( I recognize 
that there might be two different issues here)

I understood your suggestion *in this thread* as this:
"The rnc specification for the LS registration message *of a particular 
service* (not the LS itself) be split across two documents - Interface 
Specification of the LS itself and the Interface specification of the 
particular service"

Is this correct?
> This is not a bug, just an idea how to improve documentation (and 
> simplify a bit).
We want to use Bugzilla to track both bugs and enhancement requests 
(Bugzilla supports it already - just choose appropriate level on the 
right side of the window). Hence I would like you to file a 
'bug/enhancement request'. (We are getitng a lot of feedback and hearing 
a lot of ideas. Without filing them, we will forget them in future).

Loukik.

> Of course is one already did full RNC file, that's ok.
>
> Maciej