perfsonar development work

[Loukik Kudarimoti <>]

Maciej Glowiak wrote:
> Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> > umm..I am trying to understand your suggestion Maciej. I have a 
> > question. Are you suggesting that the rnc specification for the LS 
> > registration message *of a particular service* (not the LS itself) be 
> > split across two documents - Interface Specification of the LS itself 
> > and the Interface specification of the particular service?
>
> Hi Loukik,
>
> (I was pretty sure I was responsing that e-mail, but now can't find it 
> on perfsonar-dev.)
>
> That's exactly what I was thinking of.
>
> Maciej
Maciej,

We will consider this as a proposal for change for future work. For the 
upcoming release, please continue as decided already.

Further, if you can file this as a bug in bugzilla ( I have created a 
product for the hand over process), it would be very helpful. You can 
find the product here:
https://bugzilla.perfsonar.net/enter_bug.cgi?product=Handover%20Process

thanks,
Loukik.