perfsonar development work

[Maciej Glowiak <>]

Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> Maciej Glowiak wrote:
> > Loukik Kudarimoti wrote:
> > > umm..I am trying to understand your suggestion Maciej. I have a 
> > > question. Are you suggesting that the rnc specification for the LS 
> > > registration message *of a particular service* (not the LS itself) be 
> > > split across two documents - Interface Specification of the LS itself 
> > > and the Interface specification of the particular service?
> >
> > Hi Loukik,
> >
> > (I was pretty sure I was responsing that e-mail, but now can't find it 
> > on perfsonar-dev.)
> >
> > That's exactly what I was thinking of.
> >
> > Maciej
> Maciej,
>
> We will consider this as a proposal for change for future work. For the 
> upcoming release, please continue as decided already.
>
> Further, if you can file this as a bug in bugzilla ( I have created a 
> product for the hand over process), it would be very helpful. You can 
> find the product here:
> https://bugzilla.perfsonar.net/enter_bug.cgi?product=Handover%20Process

Loukik, for LSRegisterRequest I had to use that way. It's impossible to 
define schema for that request other than "sonar.rnc". I was talking 
about it many times, but maybe it wasn't so clear.

This is not a bug, just an idea how to improve documentation (and 
simplify a bit). Of course is one already did full RNC file, that's ok.

Maciej

--

 --------------------------------------------------------------------
| Maciej Glowiak        Network Research and Development            ||
| 

     Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center ||
| (+48 61) 858 2024     http://monstera.man.poznan.pl/              ||
 ====================================================================