perfsonar development work

[Szymon Trocha <>]

Matthias K. Hamm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after editing the perfSONAR Rel. Mgmt. documents for E2Emon, we have 
> some suggestions how the document set could be improved in the future:
>
> (*) we recommend decreasing the number of files. Especially the files 
> "functional specification" and "interface specification" could be 
> merged, same applies to "installation targets" and "samples for 
> configuration files". This would also decrease the need for references 
> between documents..
> (*) the formats and document structure are not always handy. Especially 
> the "interface specification" and the "metadata file specfication" with 
> it`s complex XML description sections demand a easy-to-use format. We 
> have adopted and slightly changed the RRD-MA-Example, but this could be 
> improved for better readability, too.

Hi Matthias,

Thank you for your valuable comments. As regards the format of 
specifications do you have any proposals in mind what can be changed to 
improve readability?

regards,
--
Szymon Trocha

Poznan Supercomputing & Ntw. Center ::: NETWORK OPERATION CENTER
Tel. (+48 61) 8582022
http://noc.man.poznan.pl  ::: http://noc.pionier.gov.pl