Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR Rel. Mgmt. Document Set

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR Rel. Mgmt. Document Set


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Matthias K. Hamm" <>
  • To: Szymon Trocha <>
  • Cc: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [pS-dev] perfSONAR Rel. Mgmt. Document Set
  • Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:50:38 +0100
  • Organization: DFN

Hi Szymon,

just a few suggestions:

(*) intendation of whole paragraphs should not be used too much. This applies especially to the metadata description document at the section explaining the XML structure. Personally, I think it is easier to read if the text is left bound. The structure of the XML should be clear by the numbering of the headings. As an example I attached the document for E2Emon.

(*) I do not know how much of the perfSONAR people actually use Word to edit the files (we do ;-) ). In this case, Word has handy features to provide format templates. In the RelMgmt templates, it would be helpful if pre-defined formats are used with names like "XML-Entity description". To be sure, the text in the template could give advice which of the formats to use in which section.

(*) Personally, I like if long text passages are separated from the text, e.g. by giving them a light-grey background. Perhaps we could add this feature to the templates (nice to have ;-) )

Cheers,

M&M

Szymon Trocha schrieb:
Matthias K. Hamm wrote:
Hi,

after editing the perfSONAR Rel. Mgmt. documents for E2Emon, we have some suggestions how the document set could be improved in the future:

(*) we recommend decreasing the number of files. Especially the files "functional specification" and "interface specification" could be merged, same applies to "installation targets" and "samples for configuration files". This would also decrease the need for references between documents..
(*) the formats and document structure are not always handy. Especially the "interface specification" and the "metadata file specfication" with it`s complex XML description sections demand a easy-to-use format. We have adopted and slightly changed the RRD-MA-Example, but this could be improved for better readability, too.

Hi Matthias,

Thank you for your valuable comments. As regards the format of specifications do you have any proposals in mind what can be changed to improve readability?

regards,


--

Matthias Hamm

------------------------------------------------
Leibniz-Rechenzentrum / Leibniz Computing Centre
Raum I.2.107
Boltzmannstrasse 1, 85748 Garching, Germany
Telefon: +49 89 35831-8832
Fax: +49 89 35831-9700
E-Mail:

-------------------------------------------------

Attachment: E2Emon-MP-metadata-file-spec.doc
Description: MS-Word document




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page