perfsonar development work

[Jason Zurawski <>]

> > RESOLVED
> >     A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by QA.
> >     From here bugs are either re-opened and become REOPENED, are marked
> >     VERIFIED, or are closed for good and marked CLOSED.
> > CLOSED
> >     The bug is considered dead, the resolution is correct. Any zombie
> >     bugs who choose to walk the earth again must do so by becoming
> >     REOPENED.
> >
> >
> > So I suppose we could close many of the bugs (SVN bugs especially).  
> > It is really all a matter of style, if maintainer is sure a fix 
> > provided will work for all instances of a problem, then it can be 
> > closed.  Nothing is final in bugzilla, so even if a mistake is made 
> > we can always re-open issues.
>
> I think the procedure could be:
>
> - "U[ser]" requests a bug
> - bug is assigned to "D[eveloper]"
> - discussion...
> - "D" corrects the bug and sets it as "RESOLVED"
> - "U" checks if bug is corrected and closes it ("CLOSED").


This sounds fair, although 'U' may not always remember to close 
something out.  I suppose after some length of time a 'D' can just 
assume the resolution works as well.

-jason