perfsonar development work

[Maciej Glowiak <>]

Jason Zurawski napisał(a):
> Maciej;
> > > Bugs resolved: 54
> > > Bugs closed: 1
> >
> > As you can see we have plenty resolved bugs but only 1 closed.
> > My question is - who and when should close the bug?
> >
> > Shouldn't we close most of our resolved bugs? 
>
> I found this in some bugzilla doc:
>
> RESOLVED
>     A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by QA.
>     From here bugs are either re-opened and become REOPENED, are marked
>     VERIFIED, or are closed for good and marked CLOSED.
> CLOSED
>     The bug is considered dead, the resolution is correct. Any zombie
>     bugs who choose to walk the earth again must do so by becoming
>     REOPENED.
>
>
> So I suppose we could close many of the bugs (SVN bugs especially).  It 
> is really all a matter of style, if maintainer is sure a fix provided 
> will work for all instances of a problem, then it can be closed.  
> Nothing is final in bugzilla, so even if a mistake is made we can always 
> re-open issues.

I think the procedure could be:

- "U[ser]" requests a bug
- bug is assigned to "D[eveloper]"
- discussion...
- "D" corrects the bug and sets it as "RESOLVED"
- "U" checks if bug is corrected and closes it ("CLOSED").

Maciej