perfsonar development work

[Jason Zurawski <>]

Maciej;
> > Bugs resolved: 54
> > Bugs closed: 1
>
> As you can see we have plenty resolved bugs but only 1 closed.
> My question is - who and when should close the bug?
>
> Shouldn't we close most of our resolved bugs? 

I found this in some bugzilla doc:

RESOLVED
    A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by QA.
    From here bugs are either re-opened and become REOPENED, are marked
    VERIFIED, or are closed for good and marked CLOSED.
CLOSED
    The bug is considered dead, the resolution is correct. Any zombie
    bugs who choose to walk the earth again must do so by becoming
    REOPENED.


So I suppose we could close many of the bugs (SVN bugs especially).  It 
is really all a matter of style, if maintainer is sure a fix provided 
will work for all instances of a problem, then it can be closed.  
Nothing is final in bugzilla, so even if a mistake is made we can always 
re-open issues.

-jason