Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol

Subject: perfsonar development work

List archive

Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Maciej Glowiak <>
  • To:
  • Cc: ulisses <>,
  • Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol
  • Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:52:18 +0200
  • Organization: Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center

Jason Zurawski napisaƂ(a):

<nmwgt:direction>in</nmwgt:direction>
</nmwgt:interface>


If yes, I don't understand the need for such fields

Yes, they're required. Why? Because of the schema and NMWG. Please ask Martin or Jason for details.


ok, I'm curious about the direction attribute


It's defined for <interface>. I assume for instance optical interfaces may be uni-directional.


It is just a string value, so anything that makes sense to the aplication can be used there. We have used this in the past for single directions but I don't see why it couldn't be bi-directional as well. As I said earlier, this is optional.


Hi Jason,

In this case, of course, direction is optional. It depends on service that wants to register what exactly will be publish in Lookup Info.

But I think Ulisses asked also why <metadata> is inside <data> element. Maybe you've already answered him, but I redirected him to you, because you will explain him it better ;-) I suppose the reason is in semantic difference between metadata (meta-description of data) and data.

Have a nice weekend

Maciej





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page