perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Maciej Glowiak <>
- To:
- Cc: ulisses <>,
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:52:18 +0200
- Organization: Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center
Jason Zurawski napisaĆ(a):
<nmwgt:direction>in</nmwgt:direction>
</nmwgt:interface>
If yes, I don't understand the need for such fields
Yes, they're required. Why? Because of the schema and NMWG. Please ask Martin or Jason for details.
ok, I'm curious about the direction attribute
It's defined for <interface>. I assume for instance optical interfaces may be uni-directional.
It is just a string value, so anything that makes sense to the aplication can be used there. We have used this in the past for single directions but I don't see why it couldn't be bi-directional as well. As I said earlier, this is optional.
Hi Jason,
In this case, of course, direction is optional. It depends on service that wants to register what exactly will be publish in Lookup Info.
But I think Ulisses asked also why <metadata> is inside <data> element. Maybe you've already answered him, but I redirected him to you, because you will explain him it better ;-) I suppose the reason is in semantic difference between metadata (meta-description of data) and data.
Have a nice weekend
Maciej
- questions about the LS protocol, ulisses, 07/28/2006
- Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: questions about the LS protocol, ulisses, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Jason Zurawski, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Jason Zurawski, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Jason Zurawski, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: questions about the LS protocol, ulisses, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] questions about the LS protocol, Jason Zurawski, 07/28/2006
- Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.