perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Jason Zurawski <>
- To: Maciej Glowiak <>
- Cc: ulisses <>,
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 11:02:34 -0400
<nmwgt:direction>in</nmwgt:direction>Yes, they're required. Why? Because of the schema and NMWG. Please ask Martin or Jason for details.
</nmwgt:interface>
If yes, I don't understand the need for such fields
ok, I'm curious about the direction attribute
It's defined for <interface>. I assume for instance optical interfaces may be uni-directional.
It is just a string value, so anything that makes sense to the aplication can be used there. We have used this in the past for single directions but I don't see why it couldn't be bi-directional as well. As I said earlier, this is optional.
-jason
- questions about the LS protocol, ulisses, 07/28/2006
- Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: questions about the LS protocol, ulisses, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Jason Zurawski, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Jason Zurawski, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Jason Zurawski, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: questions about the LS protocol, ulisses, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] questions about the LS protocol, Jason Zurawski, 07/28/2006
- Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.