perfsonar-dev - Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol
Subject: perfsonar development work
List archive
- From: Maciej Glowiak <>
- To: ulisses <>
- Cc: ,
- Subject: Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:25:12 +0200
- Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA CXBIWXMAAEU1AABFNQF8gVf5AAAAB3RJTUUH1QYQDjo6uEWvwgAAAM5JREFUGNNN0LFqAkEUheGj KRZsfATrvENgYyH4APabxwgWGUUQC99BsNDCInUq7VImbbDZ0kayxBXMuN7jvTuKVh//mZlmQKZ1 EhQ8GAVgZECspEBdWQHRjR70KlgFKkoUaCw3ijSYQ4n5HfBK4a4jDcdDQPol/80Sr9BxZOOL4Fmr Jq8VBx7eopaSPvWGOm67fqol3j1q0XNs7Nk2cs6MU6gPNzf+ZGKQX4Ek8H6rAnFZnXB2vJxJcv8g C2P+WzL4tD+Txc4KydrIkh+eAdo01QbjQ84vAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
- Organization: Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center
Hi Ulisses,
ulisses wrote:
Hi Maciej!
On 2006-07-28 14:11:58, Maciej Glowiak wrote:
[...]
<nmwgt:direction>in</nmwgt:direction>Yes, they're required. Why? Because of the schema and NMWG. Please ask Martin or Jason for details.
</nmwgt:interface>
If yes, I don't understand the need for such fields
ok, I'm curious about the direction attribute
It's defined for <interface>. I assume for instance optical interfaces may be uni-directional.
Also, if the register message doesn't contain [1], maybe there is not a lot of advantage having a separate keepalive message. Currently I periodically re-register.Now the registration component is very simple, just re-register data. But if you have a lot of data, you may just send keepalive message and LS will know that lookup information shouldn't be removed.
Is this wrong? Probaly I should use a sepparate the keepalive the message, isn't it?
Ok, so...
[...]
Right, keepalive contains lsKey given back after registration. The key is accessPoint, because Lookup Service works in such way, but it might be anything else. So - lsKey, not accessPoint.
So the idea is:
1. You register to LS
2. LS gives you back a KEY
3.
a. if no changes in your local lookup info -> send KEY to LS
or
b. if there are some changes -> re-register data
So, according to what you said :-) ...
I would say for b:
if there are some changes or the registration is as simple as a keepalive: re-register the data
Exactly. That's the clue. But for simplicity (as we needed registration for MA as quick as possible) we're always using re-registering data. It should be changed in the future.
Maciej
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
| Maciej Glowiak Network Research and Development ||
|
Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center ||
| (+48 61) 858 2024 http://monstera.man.poznan.pl/ ||
====================================================================
- questions about the LS protocol, ulisses, 07/28/2006
- Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: questions about the LS protocol, ulisses, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Jason Zurawski, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Jason Zurawski, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Jason Zurawski, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
- Re: questions about the LS protocol, ulisses, 07/28/2006
- Re: [pS-dev] questions about the LS protocol, Jason Zurawski, 07/28/2006
- Re: questions about the LS protocol, Maciej Glowiak, 07/28/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.